![]() ![]() Received: JAccepted: NovemPublished: December 19, 2019Ĭopyright: © 2019 Paul-Hus, Desrochers. PLoS ONE 14(12):Įditor: Cassidy Rose Sugimoto, Indiana University Bloomington, UNITED STATES Alongside formal disclaimers and acknowledgements of various contributions, there seems to remain a need for a more personal space where the authors can speak for themselves, in their own name, on matters they judge worth mentioning.Ĭitation: Paul-Hus A, Desrochers N (2019) Acknowledgements are not just thank you notes: A qualitative analysis of acknowledgements content in scientific articles and reviews published in 2015. ![]() Results also show the importance of disclaimers as part of the current scholarly communication apparatus, an aspect which was not highlighted by previous analyses and typologies of acknowledgements. Acknowledgements constitute a space where authors can detail the division of labour within collaborators of a research project. When 3,754 acknowledgement sentences were manually coded into the categories, three distinct axes emerged: the contributions, the disclaimers, and the authorial voice. The most frequent noun phrases from a Web of Science acknowledgements corpus were analysed to generate 13 categories. To improve understanding of the context and various uses of expressions found in acknowledgements, this study analyses their content qualitatively. Acknowledgements in scientific articles can be described as miscellaneous, their content ranging from pre-formulated financial disclosure statements to personal testimonies of gratitude. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |